Does the
Bible Say We Can Eat Anything?
There is
a debate going on among New Testament believers as to whether there are any
impermissible items to eat or not. Since the debate seems to be growing in
intensity, it seemed practical to bring this matter to the forefront and see if
some of the smoke on this issue can’t be cleared. Therefore, the purpose of
this article is to look at the New Testament passages dealing with food, and
see just what they are saying.
Before we
get started, let me be clear: salvation is through belief in Y’shua/Jesus, alone.
However, once we have become a child of God through belief in Y’shua, then we
must live obediently to God’s instructions, which tell us how to live
pleasingly before Him. Therefore, what we are discussing in this article is
not a salvation issue, but one of living obediently to God.
I began
my life in a Southern Baptist church where I was told that the dietary laws in
the Old Testament were no longer in effect. I grew up eating the typical
American diet. As an adult, my health began to deteriorate due to a serious
infection picked up while in the hospital. As I sought the Lord for an answer,
I was surprised when He began to teach me about eating. HE taught me most of
what I’m going to share with you. Since it was from Yahweh (the name of God of
the Bible) the proof for it can be found in both the Old and New Testaments of
the Bible.
Please
get a Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance
to find the references for the Old Testament dietary laws. I will mostly deal with
what the New Testament has to say since the controversy comes not from Torah
observant Messianics or Jews, but from those “churched” people who have been
taught that the New Testament abolished or canceled the laws – God’s
instructions - in the original covenant.
The first instance is in Matthew 15:
1) Then some Pharisees and scribes came to Y’shua (Jesus) from Jerusalem,
saying,
2) “Why do Your disciples transgress the tradition of the
elders? For they do not wash their hands when they eat bread.”
3) And He answered and said to them, “And why do you
yourselves transgress the commandment of God for
the sake of your tradition?”
So, we
see that the Pharisees were calling Y’shua (Jesus) on transgressing a
TRADITION, but not for transgressing a commandment of God. He goes on to talk
to them about honoring their parents and then says:
7) “You hypocrites, rightly did
Isaiah prophesy of you saying,
8) ‘THIS PEOPLE HONORS ME WITH THEIR LIPS, BUT THEIR HEART
IS FAR AWAY FROM ME.
9) BUT IN VAIN DO THEY WORSHIP ME, TEACHING AS THEIR
DOCTRINES THE PRECEPTS OF MEN.’”
10) And he called to Himself the multitude, and said to
them, “Hear, and understand.
11) “Not what enters into the mouth defiles the man, but
what proceeds out of the mouth, this defiles the man.” (capital letters theirs)
In this
passage, Y’shua is not even dealing with “unclean” as food because He is
talking to Pharisees and scribes, the most pious of all Judaism!
“Unclean” wasn’t even in the realm of the conversation with these people (who
didn’t even consider “unclean” to BE food), but simply whether or not by eating
with ceremonially unwashed hands defiled a man. Y’shua goes on to make
the point:
18) “But the things that proceed out of the mouth come
from the heart, and those defile the man.
19) For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murders,
adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, slanders,
20) These are the things which defile the man; but to eat with unwashed hands does
not defile the man.
Some
translations add a parenthetical clause after this statement which says: (“And
thus Jesus declared all foods clean.”) This was inserted by the editors
of the various translations, but is NOT found in the original text. This is
their editorial OPINION, but is not part of what the Messiah said. How can it
be when He was talking about washing or not washing hands and NOT talking about
food? This same event is also found in Mark 7:1-23.
Whenever
this discussion comes up I’m always confronted with Peter’s vision at Joppa,
found in Acts 10, so let’s look at it.
The
chapter begins with the story of Cornelius, a Roman centurion, “a devout man,
and one who feared God with all his household, and gave many alms to the Jewish
people and prayed to God continually.” He was visited by an angel who tells him
to send for Peter, also known as Simon at a tanner’s house by the sea. He does.
While the men are coming to the tanner’s house, Peter goes up on the rooftop to
await the noon meal and received a vision from God.
10) And he became hungry, and was desiring to eat; but
while they were making preparations, he fell into a trance;
11) and he beheld the sky opened up, and a certain object
like a great sheet coming down, lowered by four corners to the ground,
12) and there were in it all kinds of four-footed animals
and crawling creatures of the earth and birds of the air.
13) And a voice came to him, “Arise, Peter, kill and eat!”
14) Put Peter said, “By no means, Lord, for I have never eaten anything unholy and unclean.”
Bible historians date the events in this chapter to be
approximately 48-50 A.D., fifteen to
seventeen years AFTER Messiah
ascended to heaven. So even in the years with Y’shua (Jesus) on earth as well
as the interim years to this time, Peter had not eaten anything
considered “unclean” by the original covenant. And as we will see, this passage
interprets itself and clearly tells
us that this vision has nothing to do with food!!
Once
Peter’s vision lifts, the Holy Spirit tells him that there are three men
looking for him and that he is to go with them for God has sent them. The next
day, these men take Peter with them to Cornelius’ house.
25)
And when it came about that Peter entered, Cornelius met him, and fell at his
feet and worshipped him.
26) But Peter raised him up, saying, “Stand up; I too am just
a man.”
27) And as he talked with him, he entered, and found many
people assembled.
28) And he said to them, “You yourselves know how unlawful
it is for a man who is a Jew to associate
with a foreigner or to visit him; and yet God has shown me that I should not call ANY MAN unholy or unclean.
If
Scripture follows its preceding patterns of Joseph and Daniel, the dream is
given in Scripture and below it is given the interpretation. This is the same
pattern we find in this passage. Peter does not say that
this vision made pigs, shellfish, or any other unclean animal clean. Peter himself
tells us what the vision was all about! It was about him going into the home of
a Roman, a Gentile, and sharing the gospel with these “unclean” people. This is
the first documented time that this has happened – that the gospel was
specifically shared with Gentiles. Scripture uses the same words, “unholy” and
“unclean” both times to make sure we understand that this was about MEN! The
end of the chapter tells how God circumvents any misunderstanding that the Jews
who came with Peter might have had by orchestrating events that demanded the
baptism of these Gentiles, for which Peter is called to give an account to the
council in Jerusalem. (See Acts 11:15-18)
Let’s look at this in
another way. Believers in Messiah are taught that the Word of God does not
contradict itself. We are also taught that if we get a “revelation” we believe
is from God, that it must not contradict the Word of God. This premise is
correct. So, let’s apply that premise to this section of Scripture that
supposedly changed what God said.
Peter
receives a vision he believes to be from God. The church has taught that this
vision turned unclean to food in an instant. However, does this doctrine fit
the prescribed premise, above, that the church also teaches?
First, we
must remember that when Peter had this vision, the only “Word of God” he had by which to judge whether or not an
instruction was from Yahweh, was the Old Testament since the New
Testament wasn’t written and compiled until around 135 A.D. Therefore, what did
the Old Testament say that would apply to Peter’s “new revelation” supposedly
changing unclean to clean in an instant?
4. You shall follow Yahweh your God and fear Him; and you
shall keep His commandments, listen to His voice, serve Him, and cling to
Him.
5. "But that prophet or that dreamer of dreams shall be put to death, because he has
counseled rebellion against Yahweh your God who brought you from the
land of Egypt and redeemed you from the house of slavery, to seduce you from the way in which Yahweh your God commanded
you to walk. So you shall purge the evil from among you. Deuteronomy 13:4-5
As a
Jewish male, Peter was trained in the torah (traditionally call the “law”) of
God. Do you think he would have accepted instructions from a voice in a vision
that contradicted the written
instructions of the Word of God? The same Word of God that Peter and the
disciples now knew in the flesh as Y’shua/Jesus? (John 1:1-5) NO! He would not!
Therefore, according to
the criteria that the church has set for defining what is God’s truth, the
teaching of unclean being “magically” transformed into clean in an instant does
not hold up and again, Peter tells us the vision was about the Gentiles being
“grafted in,” becoming part of, and treated no differently by God than the
“cultivated olive tree” of Israel (Acts 10:28; Romans 11:11-24).
So, once
again, we have seen that Scriptures used to defend eating anything have
absolutely
nothing to do with this topic.
The next
“biggie” I hear is found in 1 Timothy 4.
1) But the Spirit explicitly says
that in later times some will fall away from the faith, paying attention to
deceitful spirits and doctrines of demons,
2) by means of the hypocrisy of liars
seared in their own conscience as with a
branding
iron,
3) men who forbid marriage and
advocate abstaining from foods, which God has created to be
gratefully shared in by those who believe and know the truth.
4) For everything created by God is
good, and nothing is to be rejected, if it is
received
with gratitude;
5) for it is sanctified by means
of the word of God and prayer.
This
Scripture was the basis for my Southern Baptist upbringing that everything was
permissible to eat as long as it was prayed over and received with gratitude.
However, I was doing that and I was seriously ill and not getting any better.
Had I not obeyed what God taught me in this area, I would probably now be dead.
To
break down this verse, first I’ll show you how God showed this to me, then we
will go and look at the Greek words and see if they confirm what He said.
God showed this to me as a
writer and showed me that the foods men would say to abstain from partaking
were foods that God had created TO be eaten. The “everything” in v. 4 is
referring back to the subject “food” mentioned in the preceding sentence. So,
“everything created by God is good, and nothing is to be rejected” ONLY if it
is “food which God has created to be gratefully shared in…” That was enough for
me, but probably won’t be for you, so let’s look up just what “food” means.
Food = Strong’s #1033, broma, bro’-mah; food (lit. or
fig.), espec. certain allowed or
forbidden by the Jewish law.
This passage is NOT saying that “unclean” has now
been okayed by God to be considered “food.” In fact, quite the opposite is
true. The Greek clearly tells us that what God previously said was allowed or
forbidden according to the “law” is also the rule for the New Testament
believer.
Therefore,
Paul is talking about men coming along in the later times and telling you that
you can’t eat chicken or salmon (a clean fish with fins and scales) or telling
you to abstain from what God proclaimed to be food. Paul is NOT endorsing
eating just anything and thinking that’s okay with God! We seem to constantly
forget what Yahweh has said about Himself:
“For I, Yahweh, do not
change;” Malachi 3:6
“Y’shua the Messiah is the same yesterday and today, yes and forever.”
Hebrews 13:8
Let me
ask you a question: is the body of Messiah sick and dying? Have you looked
at the length of the prayer lists in most churches today? If we are obeying
correctly, according to the Word of God, then God needs to apologize to us for
not taking better care of us or we’ve missed it somewhere!
Why aren’t
we at least following the bare basics required in Acts 15? In this
chapter, a discussion had arisen concerning believers who were from the
Pharisees who said that circumcision was necessary (for salvation) and these
were also directing observance of the Law of Moses. (v5)
So, the
apostles and elders came together to look into the matter and after much
debate, Peter arose and testified about his involvement in the engrafting of
the gentiles and clearly says that salvation is by grace; it cannot be earned by
circumcision, and then in verse 13, James weighs in:
13) And after they had stopped speaking, James answered,
saying, “Brethren, listen to me.
14) Simeon has related how God first concerned Himself
about taking from among the Gentiles a people for His name.
15) And with this the words of the Prophets agree….
19) Therefore it is my judgment that we do not trouble
those who are turning to God from among the Gentiles, but that we write to them
that they abstain from things
contaminated by idols and from fornication and from what is strangled and from blood.
21) For Moses from ancient generations has in every
city those who preach him, since he is read in the
synagogues every Sabbath.”
Did you
notice that three of the four things listed here deal with what we eat? The recommendation was to give the gentile
converts some BASIC requirements to follow since Moses (the Torah) was read and
preached every Sabbath in every city and from that the gentile
believers would learn the rest of what they should do. Remember, there WAS NO
“New Testament” compiled at the time these events were unfolding. The ONLY
“Scripture” they had by which to live was the OLD TESTAMENT.
When
someone becomes a new believer, do you heap on them every single thing they
need to do to change their life to be like the Messiah? Or do you give them a
few starting points knowing that they’ll get the rest as they go along? This is
the example in this passage. It is NOT discounting the validity of what God
said in the original covenant, a covenant with which gentiles would be totally
unfamiliar. Instead, they decided to give them a few things to start and let
them learn the rest as they went along. In the realm of food, apparently things
containing blood (as strangled animals would) was the top of the list of
abhorrent things for the apostles. Yet today, believers eat meat oozing with
blood regularly. If we are “New Testament believers” why do we not adhere to
the most basic of the requirements given for gentile believers in the Messiah?
From this
passage in Acts 15 it is apparent that James and the apostles knew how God
feels about the consumption of blood. This instruction is found in Leviticus
17:10,
“And any man from the house of Israel, or from
the aliens who sojourn among them, who eats any blood, I will set My face
against that person who eats blood, and will cut him off from among his
people.”
Since
Yahweh has told us in His Word that He never changes, I do not want His face
set against me! He tells us in this passage that this is the fate of those who
disobey His Word and eat blood.
Before
covering the next section of Scripture, I’d like to ask you a question. Who has
more authority, Y’shua/Jesus or Paul? If Paul wrote something that you think
contradicts what Y’shua said, then who has the “final say?” Y’shua or Paul?
This is an important difference to think about, because I have found that most
Christians quote Paul as the final authority, many times ignoring or
discounting what the Messiah, Himself, said! It is my belief that there is NO contradiction
between the two and if I think Paul said something that doesn’t line up with
what the Messiah said, then I have to go back and look at what Paul wrote in
the context of Messiah. Messiah said:
“Do not think that I came to abolish (make obsolete) the
Torah or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish but to fulfill (consecrate,
execute, i.e. carry out).
For truly I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stoke shall pass away from the Torah until
all is accomplished.” (Matthew 5:17-18)
So if the
Messiah says that the Torah won’t pass away until heaven and earth pass away,
the next logical question is, do heaven and earth still exist? To which you’d
reply, “Well yes, of course they do!” If this is such an obvious response, why
isn’t it obvious that the “law” (Torah) hasn’t been “done away with” as we’ve
been taught in the church? And if we think Paul is telling us that it has been,
then who has the final say, Y’shua, who said it hadn’t passed away, or Paul,
whom we think said it has?
My
response is that Y’shua is the final authority of these two, but also that Paul
isn’t saying anything different from His Messiah; we’ve just thought he did.
Paul confirms this in Acts 24 when he said,
“…I do serve the God of our fathers, believing everything that is in accordance with the Law (Torah)
and that is written in the Prophets.” Acts 24:14
How can
we say that Paul gave us permission to disobey the Torah’s dietary instructions
when he made this statement affirming his belief in the entire Torah?
This
leads us back to the next passage that confuses people, found in Romans 14.
Paul
begins this passage by saying we are to accept those who are weak in faith and
the weaker in faith eat only vegetables while the stronger in faith may eat all
things. In light of what Messiah said in Matthew 5 quoted above and what we’ve
seen that Paul wrote to Timothy in 1 Timothy 4, is Paul advocating eating
“anything” as part of eating “all things”? It can mean that only if you are
comfortable with the Word of God contradicting itself. He cannot be saying
one thing in one place and contradict that in another.
So, how
do we know that this isn’t what Paul is saying in this chapter? Because he
explicitly tells us later in the chapter:
15) For if because of food (broma, clean according to
the Old Testament) your brother is hurt, you are no longer walking
according to love. Do not destroy with your food (broma) him for whom Christ died.
16) Therefore do not let what is for you a good thing be spoken of as evil;
20) Do not tear down the work of God for the sake of food (broma). All things (broma)
are indeed clean, but they are evil for the man who eats and
gives offense.
21) It is good not to eat meat (kreas)
or to drink wine, or to do anything
by which your brother stumbles. (Romans 14)
Paul clearly tells us that the food to which he is
referring is BROMA: clean according to the Torah (remember, to Paul, a
Pharisee of Pharisees, “unclean” is not “food.”) The meat Paul recommends not
eating, kreas, (Strong’s
#2907) is the Greek word noting meat sacrificed to idols. Paul also sums
up the point of the entire chapter: DO NOT DO ANYTHING WHICH CAUSES YOUR
BROTHER TO STUMBLE. If your brother can only handle eating vegetables, then do
NOT eat something that offends him or causes him to stumble when in his
presence!
This
brings up an astonishing event I have witnessed repeatedly in the recent past.
People who know me know that I eat a biblically clean (kosher) diet, yet
Christians eat nasty unclean items in my presence with a very belligerent attitude, daring
me to say anything to them about what is on their plate. Of course, I do not,
but what they miss is that they are disobeying a NEW TESTAMENT
Scripture by their very attitude and actions! I have been convicted by Yahweh to obey His word, to eat
according to His word and I can prove from His word that what I’m doing is biblical, if someone wishes it
proven. However, whether or not that ever happens does not excuse the attitude
and actions of Christians in mine or other Messianic believers or Jews
presence. Do you really think you’ll
be able to minister to a non-believing Jewish person with this attitude and
doing this action? They’ll find you offensive and ignore you. How will you ever
“provoke them to jealousy” according to Romans 11, doing these things? You may
not like what you are reading, but the truth sometimes isn’t pleasant. The
question now becomes: “What is more important to you, insisting on your right
to do whatever you like about what you put in your mouth, or obedience to the
word of God and considering your brother, according to Romans 14?”
The last
passage to cover in the New Testament is found in 1 Corinthians 8. I would
suggest you read the entire thing in light of what we’ve already covered. Paul
cannot be contradicting the Messiah or what he wrote cannot be divinely
inspired Scripture. Therefore, we need to “read” this in a new way, a way that
is compliant with what Messiah said so that it fits seamlessly into the body of
Scripture.
1 Corinthians
8 is summed up in its last verse:
13) Therefore, if food (kreas) causes my brother to stumble, I will never eat meat (kreas) again, that I might not cause my
brother to stumble.
This is
just reiterating what he wrote in Romans 14, this time dealing with food
sacrificed to idols.
Paul gave
us even more insight into how he felt about the Old Testament being applicable
for the Gentiles when he said,
“‘Therefore, COME OUT FROM THEIR MIDST AND BE SEPARATE,’
says the Lord.
‘AND DO NOT TOUCH WHAT IS UNCLEAN;
AND I WILL WELCOME YOU.
AND I WILL BE A FATHER TO YOU,
AND YOU SHALL BE SONS and daughters
TO ME,
SAYS THE LORD ALMIGHTY.’
Therefore, having these promises, beloved, let us cleanse
ourselves from all defilement of flesh and
spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God.”
2 Corinthians 6:17-7:1
In 2
Corinthians, which was written to Gentiles, Paul is saying that there are
unclean things we need to avoid and that there’s something we have to do to
cleanse ourselves from fleshly defilement as well as being cleansed from
spiritual defilement! We need to come out, be separate, and do not touch,
much less eat, what is unclean!
Did
Y’shua/Jesus eat pork products or anything “unclean”? No. Y’shua lived
according to the law, didn’t He? We’re told that He was without sin, which 1
John 3:4 defines as “lawlessness,” so we know that He did not disobey the Torah
instructions because we know He wasn’t “lawless” or sinful. Therefore,
according to 1 John 2:6, neither are we to disobey the Torah instructions since
we are to “walk as He did.”
IF God
has said in Scripture that you can now eat pork, shellfish, catfish, shark,
etc. and that’s okay with Him, then why aren’t you eating rats, bats, and
turkey buzzards? “YUCK!” you say, they carry disease! How about armadillo?
They’ve been documented to give people leprosy! Why not maggots if “everything
is clean” and you are not “under the law”? Why not add them to your plate? You
see, once we begin to take this thinking to its logical conclusion, it is easy
to see the fallacy of this stance and to see that it couldn’t possibly be what
God was saying. He has already told us that He is always the same; do you
really think He has changed His thoughts on what we are to eat yet did not
specifically tell us?
“BUT,” you
say, “what about Y’shua’s teaching in Luke 10?” This passage deals with Y’shua
sending out the 70, sending them two by two. He sends them out with several
directives, one of which is:
And whatever city you enter, and
they receive you, eat what is set before you;”
(Luke 10:8)
Of
course, being sent out among the Jews wouldn’t present a problem as they ate a
“clean” diet, and in this passage, that is what He’s saying since He’s sending
them to:
“…every city and place where He Himself was going to come”
And we
know that He during His life on earth He only traveled a short distance from
His home.
To be
balanced about the Word of God, we see that Messiah tells us that when we are
out on His business and the people are receptive to His message, we are to eat
what is set before us. This keeps us from offending them before they can hear
His message. We also know that we can partake of something deadly and it will
not harm us (Mark 16: 15-20). However, that does not give us a license to
eat anything whenever we want. This is a specific exemption for a
specific purpose and ONLY if you are received in that city. There may also be
times when He will tell you NOT to eat what is set before you as a warning to
protect you from potential disease in what is offered to you. This is a
situation in which you must heed His voice and listen carefully. If you don’t,
it could prove to be deadly for you.
Recently,
we were given another “argument” saying that the Old Testament doesn't
uphold the dietary laws (!) since in Genesis 9:3, Yahweh said to Noah:
"Every moving thing that is alive shall be food
for you; I give all to you, as I gave the
green plant.”
The belief that this Scripture (“every moving thing”) disputes the
dietary law, giving a license to eat anything, is incorrect and the
Bible proves this in several ways:
1)
Noah knew the difference between clean and unclean. In obedience to YHWH's
command, he took 7 of every clean animal and only 2 (1 male, 1 female) of
the unclean animals (Genesis 6:19-22; Genesis 7:2-3).
2)
After the flood, upon departing from the ark, Noah offered sacrifice to YHWH
from the clean animals, knowing that YHWH would not accept an unclean offering
(Genesis 8:20) This again shows that Noah knew the difference between clean and
unclean, even before the Torah ("law") was given through Moses.
3)
Had Noah and/or his family eaten from the unclean animals taken on the ark,
then he would have wiped out a species that YHWH had so carefully
preserved! Of each unclean species, there were only two: a male and a female.
So, if YHWH were saying man could eat of the unclean, He'd have just made that
species extinct.
4) The position that this disputes the dietary law can
only be true if Scripture can contradict Scripture, if YHWH can change His mind,
and thus we are saying that we believe that YHWH can contradict Himself. Since
the Bible is inerrant (Psalm 19:7-11) and God doesn't change (Malachi 3:6;
Hebrews 13:8), then this belief is obviously a mistaken one.
We can
see that the Messiah did not contradict everything else He said, whether in the
New Testament as the Messiah or as the “Word” of God in the Old Testament. He
even told us that if we love Him we will keep His commandments. The only ones
He gave were in the OLD Testament (see Lawlessness
Study) as He was the one who spoke forth the Torah commands as
the “Word” (John 1:1-5). In the New Testament, Y’shua simply synopsizes the
focus of the Torah – how to live righteously with God and with man.
The
instructions of “the Word” (Y’shua) have not changed from ancient times, and
WILL be kept in the future. So what makes us think that we are exempt from the
requirements He has placed upon men at these other times? Isaiah 65-66 is a
prophetic passage of Scripture. In it, Yahweh clearly tells us how He will feel
in the end of days about this subject:
2) I have spread out My hands all the day long to a rebellious people, who walk in a way
that is not good, after their own
thoughts
3) A people who
provoke Me to My face continually, sacrificing [to idols] in gardens and
burning incense upon bricks [instead of at God’s prescribed altar];
4) Who sit among the graves [trying to talk to the dead]
and lodge among the secret places [or caves where familiar spirits were thought
to dwell]; who eat swine’s flesh, and
the broth of abominable and loathsome things is in their vessels;
5) Who say, Keep to you yourself; do not come near me, for
I am set apart from you. These are smoke in My nostrils, a fire that burns all
the day. (Isaiah 65, AMP)
3) [The acts of the hypocrite’s worship are as abominable
to God as if they were offered to idols.] He who kills an ox [then] will be
guilty as if he slew and sacrificed a man; he who sacrifices a lamb or a kid,
as if he broke a dog’s neck and sacrificed him; he who offers a cereal
offering, as if he offered swine’s blood;
he who burns incense [to God], as if he blessed an idol. [Such people] have chosen their own ways, and they
delight in their abominations; (Isaiah 66, AMP)
In fact,
having gone through every New Testament word for “food” and “meat” and “flesh”
in the Strong’s Concordance, I can tell you that there is not ONE word that
gives us permission to do away with or ignore the dietary instructions given in
the Torah. Other than broma (Strong’s
#1033) and kreas (#2907) at which
we’ve already looked, the other words used in the New Testament for food, meat
or flesh are:
FOOD:
5160, trophe = nourishment; by impl. rations
(wages)
1304, diatribe =
to wear through (time), i.e. remain,
(as in “having food and raiment,
let us be content.” 1 Timothy 6:8)
1035, brosis =
eating (lit. or fig.); by extens. (concr.) food (lit. or fig.), the act of
eating
MEAT:
5315, phago = to eat (lit. or fig.)
4620, sitometron =
a grain-measure, i.e. (by impl.) ration (allowance of food); portion of meat
1034, brosimos =
eatable, used only 1 time in Luke 24:41 referring to broiled fish and honeycomb
4371, prosphagion
= something eaten in addition to bread; i.e. a relish
5132, trapeza =
a table or stool (as being four-legged), usually for food (fig. a meal);
FLESH
4561, sarx =
flesh (as stripped of the skin), i.e. (strictly) the meat of an animal (as
food), or (by extens.) the body (as opposed to the soul [or spirit], or as the
symbol of what is external, or as the means of kindred), or (by impl.) human
nature (with its frailties [phys. Or mor.] and passions), or (spec.) a human
being (as such)
Examples of 4561 (sarx):
The spirit is willing but the
flesh is weak. Matthew 26:41
And the two shall become one
flesh. Mark 10:8
All flesh shall see the salvation
of God. Luke 3:6
And the Word was made flesh and
dwelt among us. John 1:14
That which is born of the flesh is
flesh… John 3:6
…I will pour out of my Spirit upon
all flesh; Acts 2:17
…no flesh shall be justified in
His sight…Romans 3:20
…and make no provision for the
flesh… Romans 13:14
…not many wise men after the
flesh, not many might…1 Cor. 1:26
…if we walked according to the
flesh…2 Corinthians 10:2-3
…he who was born of the bondwoman
was born after the flesh: Gal 4:23
For we wrestle not against flesh
and blood…Eph. 6:12
…have no confidence in the flesh.
Phil. 3:3
For though I be absent in the
flesh…Col. 2:5
As far as
I can tell from investigating every listing of this word in the Strong’s, no
example of this word in the entire New Testament is in relation to what is
eaten.
If Yahweh
has exempted us from the dietary instructions in the Torah, then He has been
grossly unjust to not exempt us from the penalty of disobeying them. The
penalty of disobeying His teaching and instruction are the diseases that come
from eating these unclean items; a link that medical science has more than
proven, such as the following diseases linked to shellfish: hepatitis A, yersiniosis, shigella, V. parahaemolyticus, poisoning and even death from V.
vulnificus; toxoplasmosis, taeniasis or cysticercosis, trichinosis and
cirrhosis of the liver from eating pork.
The
penalty of disobedience to God’s instructions in the Torah is clearly stated in
Deuteronomy 28:58-62:
58. If you are not careful to observe all
the words of this Torah which are written in this book, to fear this honored
and awesome name, Yahweh your God,
59. then Yahweh will bring extraordinary plagues on you
and on your descendants, even severe and lasting plagues, and miserable and chronic sicknesses.
60. And He will bring back on you all the diseases of
Egypt of which you were afraid, and they shall cling to you.
61. And every sickness and every plague which, not
written in the book of this Torah, Yahweh will bring on you until you
are destroyed.
62. Then you shall be few in number, whereas you were as
the stars of heaven for multitude, because you did not obey Yahweh your
God.
It’s
interesting to note that there is no
disease listed under the first part of this chapter (Deuteronomy 28:1-14) when
obedience to God’s Torah is followed (which includes the dietary instructions).
The only diseases listed (Deuteronomy 28:15, 20-22, 27-28, 35) are from NOT
obeying what God instructed us to do.
I’d like to take a moment to
clarify a point. I am not speaking of a rabbinically kosher diet based upon the
rulings of rabbis who have ruled such things as:
Meat (the
flesh of birds and mammals) cannot be eaten with dairy.
Fish, eggs, fruits, vegetables and grains can be eaten with either meat or
dairy. (According to some views, fish may not be eaten with meat).
Utensils that have come into contact with meat may not be used with dairy, and
vice versa.
Grape
products made by non-Jews may not be eaten…(and there are many more)
As an example to show you the difference
about which I’m speaking, the Bible simply says we are not to cook the kid in
its mother’s milk, which is a specific prohibition. In principle, it tells us
not to cook meat in the milk that would nurture that creature. However, the
rabbis expanded this principle to say that no meat and dairy can be combined in
a dish or in the same meal, nor can you use the same dishes for meat and dairy,
nor the same refrigerator or sink! This is adding to the word of God, which we
are not to do, and making God’s word a burden to His people, something for
which Y’shua specifically condemned the Pharisees and leaders of His day.
Therefore,
I am speaking of eating strictly according to the Word of God, which is a
biblically clean diet, and obeying the rules and principles that God put in His
word without following additional rules that have been made by men.
Still, people hold to what they’ve been taught vs. what
God said in His word. It is not unusual to hear people (who don’t study the
word, but quote their preacher, thus “rules made by men”) say, “But, 1 Timothy 4 also covers that
anything is now clean..." One day,
Yahweh gave us this answer to that statement:
In reality, even you don't believe what you
said, that "anything" is clean. What that statement refers to is
what your culture says is clean. You consider shellfish, pork and catfish
"food" but wouldn't consider rats, bats, roaches,
maggots, turkey buzzards, and other things your culture calls disgusting,
"food." Therefore, even you don't really consider
"anything" to be food. The true issue is whose definition you choose to
live by: that of your culture or God's.
Having more than adequately made the case for the word of
God not changing, for the words of Messiah being true and not contradicting
what Paul wrote; that we’ve just misunderstood it by reading the Bible through
“Gentile glasses” as opposed to seeing it from the perspective of the men who
wrote it (God’s perspective), it is easy to see how we have misunderstood what
Yahweh put into His divinely inspired Word since we do not understand His
commandments. (See Lawlessness Study)
D. Thomas
Lancaster succinctly summarizes:
Every commandment of Torah is spoken by the mouth of God.
Each command is therefore holy and eternal. Whether or not a particular
commandment seems to apply in our day is irrelevant. Human society may change,
but God does not change. Every commandment is a distillation of His essence, a
pure revelation of His person. The study of the commandments is the study of
God. As soon as we begin to discard commandments, we have begun editing God.¹
If Yahweh
was going to change His instructions and teachings (Torah), don’t you think
He’d have specifically told us? And, don’t you think He’d have given us at
least one living example of this through Y’shua and/or His
disciples? Yet, there is NO Biblical record of them EVER eating ANYTHING
unclean.
I will
end this article by telling you what Yahweh told me when I questioned Him about
this. I said to Him, “Father, people get so MAD when I talk to them about this!
They “put up their dukes” with me (in my seminar on Biblical nutrition) when I
talk about this. What do you want me to tell them?” To which He replied, “Tell
them that Jesus’ death on the cross did not change the physical makeup of pork.”
You know what, He is right.
¹Lancaster,
D. T. Torah Club Volume Five, FFOZ,
2004, p. 433, quoted in Holy Cow by
Hope Egan, First Fruits of Zion, Inc., 2005, (emphasis mine)
Recommended
Reading:
God’s Keys to Health and Happiness by
Elmer Josephson
What the Bible Says About Healthy
Living by Rex
Russell, M.D.
Excerpt from Dr.
Russell’s book:
“Scripture mentions pork many times and always having a negative connotation. The pig’s flesh is described as “putrid,” “filthy” or “unclean.” Humans classify pork as red meat, but the Bible groups pork with blood, bowel movements, road kill, buzzards, snakes, rats and roaches. In my opinion, eating pork may be the most damaging item on this list.”
"the differences between clean and
unclean animals appear to be related to their primary food source and to their
digestive systems. Scavengers that eat anything and everything are not suitable
for food, according to the Bible. Animals described as clean, and therefore
good for food, primarily eat grasses and grains.
".
. . [But] note that an animal doesn't have to be a scavenger to be unclean.
Horses and rabbits, for example, are unclean because they do not have split
hooves. Although they are considered to be good food in some countries, studies
have shown that horse meat often contains viruses and parasites. Rabbits, as
innocent as they appear, are the cause of tularemia (an infectious disease) in
humans.
"One
reason for God's rule forbidding pork is that the digestive system of a pig is
completely different from that of a cow. It is similar to ours, in that the
stomach is very acidic. Pigs are gluttonous, never knowing when to stop eating.
Their stomach acids become diluted because of the volume of food, allowing all
kinds of vermin to pass through this protective barrier. Parasites, bacteria,
viruses and toxins can pass into the pig's flesh because of overeating. These
toxins and infectious agents can be passed on to humans when they eat a pig's
flesh" (Russell, p. 76-77).
Dr.
Russell's supporting evidence for his views isn't for the faint of heart. He
writes: "In the United States, three of the six most common food-borne
parasitic diseases of humans are associated with pork consumption.
These
include toxoplasmosis, taeniasis or cysticercosis (caused by the pork tapeworm
Taenia solium) and trichinellosis . . .
"It
has long been recognized that the meat of shellfish-shrimp, crabs, lobsters,
etc.-is especially dangerous. Many illnesses, including instant paralysis,
devastate some people every day as a result of eating shellfish.
"The
largest cholera outbreak in the United States occurred in Louisiana from August
through October 1986. (note: not exactly ancient history; nor was this
before modern refrigeration and technological advances.)
(The
symptoms of cholera are explosive diarrhea, leading to rapid dehydration,
unconsciousness, hypotension and death.) What did the stricken people eat? The
incriminating meals were found to include rice noodles with shrimp, pork,
vegetables, mussel soup, pig blood coagulated with vinegar, and salty brine
shrimp with mixed vegetables.
"Shellfish
can be placed in a body of water that is contaminated with cholera bacteria,
and they will purify the water. Shrimp, oysters, crab, scallops and mussels are
particularly efficient at this. They filter large volumes of water every day.
Sewage laden with chemicals, toxins and harmful bacteria, parasites and viruses
become concentrated in those shellfish. The cause of cholera outbreaks in
several areas has been traced to contaminated shrimp, crab, oysters and clams.
".
. . Reading all this, you might not be surprised to learn that the state
Legislature of California proposed a law requiring the food industry to label
shellfish with a message warning: 'This food may be dangerous to your health.'
Why? In a single year, 50 deaths and many hospitalizations were found to have
been caused by eating shellfish" (Russell, pp. 78-79).